String Machines in Bowling: A Questionable Certifying Decision by USBC

I have mixed feelings about the recent decision by the United States Bowling Congress (USBC) to certify string machines. While I understand the need to ensure consistency and fairness in the sport, I have serious doubts about the efficacy of certifying these types of machines.

For those who may not be familiar with string machines, they are a relatively new type of bowling equipment that uses strings to set up the pins instead of traditional mechanical pinsetters. The strings are attached to the top of the pins and are pulled up and out of the way when the ball hits the pins. The pins then fall back down into place for the next frame.

See my video on this decision here.

One of the main arguments in favor of certifying string machines is that they are more cost-effective and easier to maintain than traditional mechanical pinsetters. While this may be true, it does not necessarily mean that they are better for the sport of bowling.

One of my main concerns is that the use of string machines could potentially change the dynamics of the game. Because the strings are thinner and lighter than traditional pins, they may not provide the same level of resistance to the ball. This could lead to an increase in strikes and spares, which would fundamentally alter the way the game is played. Here is a link to USBC's video talking about their decision. 

While I understand the rationale behind certifying string machines, I have serious reservations about their use in the sport of bowling. Until more research is done to assess their impact on the game, I believe it would be wise for the USBC to hold off on certifying them. The integrity of the sport should always be the top priority, and we must ensure that any changes we make do not compromise that integrity.

Don't forget to check out my new book teaching how not to have a mental game like me.